I'm an aspiring filmmaker (writer, editor and director). I live in the WNY/Buffalo area which has an active, growing community of indie/micro-budgeted filmmakers ($5-$50,000). My efforts to make films have been slow, but I'm still hopeful. In the meantime, I'm living vicariously through other filmmakers I know! I also have a background in local theater and I draw. So, all that is in the mix here, baby! This blog is an effort to detail my journey toward making movies.
*apologies to Thomas Stearns Eliot, although that's probably one of the most poetic paraphrases of a line of poetry you've ever had the good fortune to read! **
April 26, 2016
In honor of April being National Poetry Month, here's a link to a post from my former movie blog on Livejournal. Ah, I impulsively jumped ship to Blogger after having an aggravatingly difficult period of time posting new material on Livejournal, but the other blog still exists.
The post showcases all the Horror Movie Haiku I wrote and submitted to another blog for a contest. The details, my awesome haiku (okay, none of them won anything! Damn you, CRwM!) and my commentary for them can be enjoyed over and over again here.
Here are the films that inspired the SIXTEEN haiku [NOTE: fifteen were entered in the contest, and the additional entry was for yet another blog contest, but in this context it was still arguably horror film related]:
NUDE FOR SATAN This is the English dubbed trailer, but both versions of the film (original Italian language w/English subtitles or English dubbed) on the Redemption DVDoffer their own distinct pleasures i.e. the English translations aren't exactly the same.
GODZILLA
This is for the original 1954 Japanese production,
not the 1956 American recut-release that included footage of
Raymond Burr as American journalist Steve Martin.
ROSEMARY'S BABY This is kind of a surprisingly trippy trailer. I'm not sure if it was actually produced during the same time it was originally released, or if it's some fan-created thing, but here ya go...
HALLOWEEN Director John Carpenter served up three things to audiences in 1978 and you get elements of all of them in this trailer: 1) the film itself; 2) his deceptively simple yet unforgettable soundtrack; and 3) foreshadowing for a later horror classic he would make, his remake of THE THING (1982).The B&W film that the little girl is watching is the original THE THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD (1951) directed by Christian Nyby and Howard Hawks.
JENIFER Part of me is loathe to post this trailer but it's the only thing I had to choose from other than specific scenes on Youtube. This trailer reveals a lot but since it's a one hour episode from a horror anthology, I'm not sure how much of a spoiler situation this is. Still, quasi-SPOILER warning!
FRIDAY THE 13TH This is the first film in the series, and I wrote three haiku based on Jason. One specifically concerns him wearing his iconic goalie mask, but...
FRIDAY THE 13TH PART 3 ...he doesn't wear that until the third entry in the franchise.
ALIEN I don't remember this trailer but its pretty good!
BONUS!
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN The B&W cinematography is gorgeous and it's fun to hear Mel Brooks himself doing the narration!
Horror film-muses
All affecting, infecting
my ingestive heart
**T.S. Eliot, natch! BTW, did you know that H.P. (as in Lovecraft) stood for Howard Phillips? Or that S.E. (as in Hinton) stood for Susan Eloise? Or that A.A. (as in Milne) stood for Alan Alexander? Or that C.S. (as in Lewis) stood for Clive Staples? Or that E.E. (as in Cummings) stood for Edward Estlin? Or that D.H. (as in Lawrence) stood for David Herbert? Or that A.S. (as in Byatt) stood for Antonia Susan? Or that J.K. (as in Rowling) actually is just part of her pen name (her full name is simply Joanne Rowling BUT the K does stand for Kathleen after her grandmother)? Or that J.R.R. (as in Tolkien) stood for John Ronald Reuel? Hey, you never know when you might be kidnapped and subjected to some Jeopardy contestant/SAW scenario...
Originally started this around May 9, 2014 Good morning! I have a bad habit of DVRing movies and then never getting around to watching them. Similar to my buying DVDs and never getting around to watching them. Similar to me writing down ideas for movie ideas and screenplays and comic books and never getting around to actually trying to write a first draft and develop them. Similar to...
Anyway, I was trying to watch one or two things this morning that I had DVRed while eating a delicious breakfast that my wife made, and I decided to watch an episode of TCM'S UNDER THE INFLUENCE with ELVIS MITCHELL, a half hour show where film critic Mitchell interviews someone from Hollywood (typically an actor or director from the few episodes I've seen) and asks them what their cinematic (or any creative discipline) influences are. I already have a bad habit of spontaneously, impulsively DVRing programs and then never watching them, instead letting them accumulate to my wife's irritation because I then start crowding out all the TV series she DVRs. So, I try to occasionally keep up and delete a few shows to keep the domestic peace and more importantly, keep my head from being completely severed from my neck via conjugal fu.
The guest of this episode of ELVIS MITCHELL was writer/director Quentin Tarantino, and if any filmmaker has influences on his work, it's this dude, so I was looking forward to checking this out. Topics were all over the place, understandably, because Tarantino was talking film and a lot of his love is associative, so he'll talk about one film and or actor or director he loves (or doesn't) and that will usually lead to another topic. Which is great for film geeks talking, but I think Mitchell had to really work at times to keep QT focused-- it was only a half hour show. But the one thing I really liked was Tarantino listing his top three comic performances in the history of cinema, or some hyperbole like that. They were:
1. Rex Harrison in writer/director Preston Sturges' UNFAITHFULLY YOURS (1948);
Rex Harrison (r) suspects his wife, Linda Darnell (center) of having an affair with Kurt Krueger (l).
2. Cary Grant in director Howard Hawks' HIS GIRL FRIDAY (1940);
Cary Grant, Frank Jenks, Roscoe Karns, Gene Lockhart, Pat Flaherty, Porter Hall, Alma Kruger, and Rosalind Russell.
3. and Eli Wallach in director Sergio Leone's THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY (1966/1967, USA Release)
Clint Eastwood and Eli Wallach.
Of course, the last choice is typical of Tarantino, appreciating a specific genre film for reasons atypical of that genre's attributes (in this case, a Leone spaghetti western). [NOTE: I figure there's a distinction between a spaghetti western and a western, and a further distinction between a spaghetti western and a Leone spaghetti western, hence...] Anyway, that's a pretty awesome triple feature I'm going to have to watch someday. I've seen them all before already, but it's been awhile. My favorite Sturges' comedy is THE LADY EVE, with Barbara Stanwyck and Henry Fonda but UNFAITHFULLY YOURS is really very funny as well. In fact, I remember watching the Sturges film long ago with slowly dawning surprise, that I was familiar with the plot because I didn't realize the similarly titled 1984 comedy with Dudley Moore and Nastasja Kinski WAS a remake (and pretty damn funny). But the original is really excellent, and Rex Harrison is wonderfully ridiculous as Linda Darnell's jealous husband, imagining three ways to have the perfect revenge on his wife and "her lover": he imagines executing each scenario out perfectly (which we see) and then we witness his attempt to follow through on these plans and things just go terribly each time. His battle of wits with a type of phonograph player that will record your voice onto a record is a favorite moment. Of the three films, I've seen HIS GIRL FRIDAY most recently, and that remains one of my favorite comedies. One of the best! It's been a long damn time since I've seen the Leone film, so it's a good excuse to get re-acquainted. Anyway, it was a good interview, and of course, now that I've seen it, I want to save it and not delete it...
*Okay, I admit it: "zany," and perhaps even "chick flick," are being used ironically here (depending on your interpretation of terms).
April 18, 2016 about 3:00 pm
Alright.
I already have at least two other movie reviews I want to
finish writing, having started one last summer (!) and the other one a couple
months ago. So, of course, I’m starting a THIRD review before finishing either
of the others. But I have my reasons—simply put, I keep thinking about this movie
after having seeing it [now over 36 hours ago]. I’m going to try and just blitz
through this review. try to purge these thoughts from my system. Maybe I’ll actually finish what I started this time…
[NOTE: I’m still
writing and editing as I go along and I started this at midnight last night.
It’s 10:30 am now. Yes, I did sleep in-between, but still…]
I saw MANIA at the recent Buffalo Niagara Film Festival
(BNFF) which ran from April 13-17 at the Tonawanda Castle, at 69 Delaware St., in Tonawanda, NY. I didn’t realize beforehand that the film was even playing, but
when I learned that it was I made a point of seeing it because it was directed
by Jessica Cameron.
Jessica isn’t from the Buffalo, NY area, but from Canada.
Born in Owen Sound, Ontario, she later moved to Toronto and after acting in
several independent films (made in the U.S.), she moved to Los Angeles to
pursue acting full-time. But she also runs Small Town Girl Productions which
focuses mainly on producing genre films. (BTW, all this info is from the handy
Jessica Cameron Wikipedia page).
Now, I don’t know how writer/director (and friend) Adam
Steigert and his Hamburg film company DefTone Pictures Studios crossed paths
with Jessica, but she had a small role in their darkly comic horror film, A
GRIM BECOMING (2014), where she played the character Life. By coincidence, I
was an extra for one day on that film (I can be seen very briefly in the funeral
home scene) but sadly, I never met Jessica in person during shooting. However,
it was through that production that I first heard about her, and soon afterwards, I learned of her directorial debut, TRUTH OR DARE (2014). Shortly
thereafter, that film happened to be in the 2014 BNFF which was held at the (now defunct)
Market Arcade theater. It was a pretty effective film and Jessica also had a
role in it.
Through Facebook I learned of her next project, MANIA, and
now, about a year and a half later, was delighted that I had the opportunity to
see another Jessica Cameron film playing at another edition of the BNFF.
After watching it Saturday night (April 16), I’ve been thinking about
it constantly ever since for a variety of reasons. So, enough about me talking about
nothing, let’s get on with the damn review!
Already from the MANIA movie poster itself we get a sense that the
filmmakers are aiming for a reckless, unbridled sort of exploitation film vibe. The tagline wantonly brags: “A Fucked Up Lesbian Love Story.”
Tristan Risk and Ellie Church are Brooke and Mel
respectively, ie. our lesbian lovers. [NOTE: Considering the lovers’ names,
you’d think we’d be watching more of an irreverent comedy because the pairing
of their monikers seems more than coincidental (uh, reverse the order to get my meaning), but
this isn’t quite a parody of THELMA AND LOUISE. Oh, it gets strangely humorous,
and inappropriately so at times, but it
really ain’t that kind of movie.]
After first sharing via screen text the definition of the
word “mania”, the text disappears and we're left looking at a black screen. As we sit in the darkness, we begin to hear a woman moaning,
eventually revealing that it’s Brooke being orally pleasured by Mel. Then it’s time
for Mel to go to work and before she goes she reminds Brooke to take her pill.
After that, everything goes south.
Basically, Brooke has issues, psychological medical issues,
and she really needs to stay on top of taking her pills. This morning she
perhaps didn’t, then she had some bad work-related news which she was dealing
with poorly, and then she kind of went… cuckoo. And by cuckoo, I don’t mean
Brooke tried to lay her eggs in another women’s nest, I mean she goes all
crackbrained and kills a friend in cold blood with a hammer. Cuckoo. When Mel comes home
and discovers the bloody, pulp-faced carcass in the front hall, the only thing
she can think to do is get rid of the body, grab Brooke and some quickly
packed bags and start running as far away as possible, pronto!
From then on, MANIA becomes a road movie, a road movie where
things just keep going wrong for our two lovers.
I LOVE the simplicity of the set-up.
I was also thrilled to be watching a movie starring both
Tristan Risk and Ellie Church, because they’ve been on my radar after reading
about them in other films, films which I haven’t gotten around to actually seeing. Like,
Tristan Risk is in Jen and Sylvia Soska's’ AMERICAN MARY, and even though I have
that DVD signed by those talented, slyly provocative siblings, I haven’t watched it yet ‘cause…
I’m a dork. Nor have I watched Astron-6’s latest, THE EDITOR, which also has
Ms. Risk in it and I also own a DVD of (again: Dork! Dork!). As for Ellie
Church, I have seen her in "the lost slasher film of the 70s" HEADLESS (uh, I just haven’t finished my review of
it, yet! That’s the one I started last summer…) where I thought she was great
playing an employee working at a roller-skating rink who’s blunt, cynical and
pretty funny. What’s neat was I thought her character in MANIA was distinctly
different from her character in HEADLESS. As Mel, she is, to a degree, naively sincere (especially in these specific circumstances of being in constant "escape mode"), a sort of
idealistic person who makes a “promise to protect” Brooke, the one she loves,
and for that matter, Mel believes in love as well. As the film goes on, this
belief in herself and what she can do to protect Brooke is severely tested.
Besides the impulsive desperation of Mel’s escape strategy,
it’s further complicated by two important facts: 1) Mel’s the only one
apparently competent enough to drive and 2) occasionally Mel needs to stop and
sleep. Normally, the notion of them having to stop mid-flight to points unknown would increase the suspense of being caught, but in this
case, there’s another more pressing problem: when Mel sleeps, either in the car
or in a motel, Brooke conveniently goes into this sort of trance (for lack of a
better word), where she looks awake but her head’s definitely in another
world.Let’s call it Homicidal
Sleepwalking. Specifically, Brooke is motivated by some Praying Mantis/Black
Widow type of manic complex where her brain may be elsewhere but her body is
here and wants to immediately fuck the first strange guy she comes in contact
with (and its definitely “fucking” not the more polite “have sex with”), but in
this case its vigorous spontaneous sex as foreplay
because after she achieves carnal completion, our Ms. Brooke is compelled to
reciprocate the male’s act of penetration with her own, using whatever’s handy which is usually something Sharp, Metal and Stabby (the Divorce Law Firm of…). One of
the more obvious ways both actresses commit to the film are the way they embrace the variety of scenes that require them to be nude or damn near nude, and as Brooke in “assertive date mode”, Tristan Risk is
emphatically unself-conscious about displaying and utilizing her body. Being a guy, I had no problem with this plot
device/character trait. I don’t know what specific clinical mental issue Brooke
had but from an exploitation film perspective, it’s definitely an attention grabber.
Although, actual mental illnesses aside, you could almost formulate a dysfunctional motivation for her impulsive couplings and killings: some
misplaced insecurity/jealousy. As they continue to drive, Brooke asks Mel
pointedly why she became a lesbian knowing she used to date men. After hearing
her explanation, Brooke then asks her how many men she slept with, but Mel won’t
go there. But since these questions come shortly after we witness a Brooke terminal
quickie, you kind of read into these series of questions. There are times when we see them driving at night where the fragmented illumination of oncoming headlights picks out the women’s separate
faces from the darkness and Tristan Risk’s beautiful, staring visage takes on a mask-like
quality, similar to the iconic Barbara Steele, a fascinating, enigmatic quality
which serves her brooding silences well.
Meanwhile, when Mel does get a chance to sleep, she doesn’t
get much rest because she’s tormented by nightmares involving Brooke. On one level, director
Cameron has some fun with these nightmares, dolling Mel up in
increasingly fancy and outrageous fake eyelashes for example. But the nightmare
scenes are also executed to explore moodier, surreal depths, serving up tangible
ways to appreciate Mel’s inner thoughts and fears. Obviously, she’s terrified
of losing Brooke, as she dreams of finding Brooke dead or having committing
suicide, or she’s being physically dragged away from Brooke, etc.
Meanwhile, Brooke’s ongoing impulse to fornicate then
exterminate impromptu sexual partners doesn’t seem to let up. Out of desperation,
Mel frantically tries to distance themselves from the increasing body count by erasing their on-going trail but
she’s also freaking out more and more because she realizes she’s in way over
her head.
The plot takes some sick delight in throwing further
complications at our lovers on the run. When they need to steal a car our
desperately intrepid couple risk searching for the car keys in an unfamiliar house, trying to remain undiscovered even while an increasing number of occupants are still active inside. This sequence
features a simple yet amusingly bizarre cameo by Ellie Church’s real husband,
actor/director Brian Williams. Williams was also in HEADLESS as Church’s
genuinely sleazy boss of the skating rink, but this time he shows us a more
sensitive side by being dressed in drag. During this same sequence, there’s an
ongoing extended sex scene being hammered out not only as visual and aural comic
relief, but also as a way of increasing suspense if the sexual participants happen to take a sudden break and then possibly discover our protagonists searching the
immediate environs by sneaking along the floor dog-style, and then director
Cameron does a smooth bit of injecting further suspense as well.
There are additional developments sprung upon our
anti-heroines, like a mugging by a drifter and a free dinner with unexpected
consequences.
If I had any quibbles, part of me wished the tension could
have been ratcheted up even more at times, and I second-guessed the wisdom of
(somewhat) revealing in advance the intentions of the dinner hostess.
I’ll go a little more into that plus some other thoughts but
that’s going to be a spoiler heavy conversation, so I’ll get to that at the end
of this review.
After Brooke unintentionally (‘cause she’s nutty) but
unequivocally undermines a possible way out of their mess, the film runs
headlong into its conclusion. Earlier I noted the somewhat “misleading”
coincidence of their names, Mel and Brooke. But, in hindsight, perhaps any
“meaning” their two names have because they “go together” has less to do with
the film genre and is more an indication of some twisted star-crossed destiny
of their tragic love (and still a simple but sincere cinematic shout out?). Arguably the couple's earlier nude scenes together may be exploitation film fodder visually speaking, but these risqué moments also show evidence of a gentle, sensual
quality of tangible affection being expressed between the lovers. Before their fateful journey strained their emotional bonds together, their names are sweetly suitable together.
For the most part, the film is a thrilling joyride into shared madness served up well by: our two committed leads (and
interpret that however way you want), Ms. Risk and Ms. Church; a disturbingly
enjoyable plotline from screenwriter Jonathan Scott Higgins; intimate and
creative direction from Jessica Cameron;consistently sweet looking visuals and lighting from Director of
Photography Josh Chiara (for instance, I LOVED the shots where one of the leads
was in tight close-up on one half of the screen, like Brooke staring at the
camera out the window, and in the other half of the screen in the background
but still in focus was Mel entering full-body into the house and discovering
the first corpse on the floor). Oh! And I also love the graphics of the beginning and end credits.
MANIA was a pretty damn fine exploitation ride! I’m thinking
this would make a suitable double-feature with either the Soska Sisters’ debut
DEAD HOOKER IN A TRUNK or Alexandre Aja’s HIGH TENSION. Hope it does well on
the film festival circuit and I look forward to seeing it again.
Here's the 31 second teaser for MANIA. NOT SAFE FOR WORK! But you'll get a sense of what you're in for.
ALSO: SPECIAL BONUS!
Excellent interview with Jessica Cameron about directing, horror films, and a surprising answer as to what film she would remake if she could and with what dream cast. From the Australian website Cult Projections, which looks pretty cool on its own.
POSTSCRIPT: SOME ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS, BUT * WARNING *
SPOILERS APLENTY-ISH!
Okay, this is just some additional thoughts/remarks . Part
of this is me talking completely as an armchair/wanna-be filmmaker. Part of
this is just me making additional comments but I feel it would be best saved
for those readers who’ve already seen the film.
1 1. First of all, a really MINOR point. I was
somewhat surprised by the nudity and the amount of it in MANIA (but not
disappointed, in fact most certainly I was delighted) although I wasn’t
complaining (again: nope!). I say surprised because when I saw Jessica
Cameron’s directorial debut, TRUTH OR DARE, there’s a scene where actress
Devanny Pinn comes out wearing a bikini but suddenly she’s like covered up or
removed from the scene. I forget how the scene actually transpired, but I
remember that a point seemed to be made that she needed to cover up. And I
thought, how weird, because I didn’t think Ms. Pinn would be self-conscious
about appearing in a bikini, so I wondered if this was something to attribute
to the director sensibility-wise? Of course, I also wondered if, perhaps, I
remembered this scene completely incorrectly (and I did wish I could watch the
film again just to see if I had the same reaction). But, since seeing TRUTH OR
DARE, in my mind the notion of some sort of “selective puritanism” was attached
to Jessica Cameron’s name because of how I perceived that scene in TRUTH OR
DARE. And I say “selective” because she had no apparent issues with gore,
profanity, etc. back then or now. So, in a (not really) similar way, I also had
John Carpenter “pegged” as a filmmaker who would rather suggest than show
actual gore, based on watching HALLOWEEN, THE FOG and ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK…and
then I saw THE THING. But, getting back to the film at hand, after seeing
MANIA, I was either 1) absolutely wrong about my original perceptions; or 2)
Jessica seriously got over her “hang-ups,“ haha!
I guess this a question for the director if
she happens to read this…
2. When I mentioned my wish for possibly increasing
the tension in the film, I thought there were a couple moments when there was a
specific opportunity to milk a situation for more tension and it didn’t go that
way. First, the mugging scene. I thought that was great, because you think, “Oh
my god, this bastard just stole their money, now what!?” But, the big thing is,
he stole Brooke’s pills, and that’s an even more “Oh, shit!” moment. However, I
think Mel should have been more beside herself and maybe tried to catch the guy
as he ran away. I know he was armed, and maybe
he could have hurt her but I’m thinking she knows for certain what Brooke off medication means. Her attempt to fight
the guy for the pills didn’t have to be successful, but just an illustration of
how Mel is getting further stressed out and hysterical, and if Brooke is the
loose cannon, Mel is now deteriorating out of desperation into conducting her
own dubious actions. But even if she still didn’t try to catch the guy and get
back the pills, I think she should have been a lot more emphatic that they
shouldn’t accept the strange woman’s dinner invitation, out of a need to protect the woman. Then, a strained
conversation between Mel and Brooke on the topic of whether Brooke can be
trusted in society would start to further undermine the doubt Brooke has that
Mel still loves her.
3 3. As stated earlier, immediately after the mugging scene,
we introduce the good Samaritan woman who conveniently discovers they’ve been
mugged mere seconds ago and out of apparent kindness, she offers them a free
meal. It’s a borderline generous and bizarre offer from a stranger, but I’m
thinking Mel is really hesitant to put Brooke in contact with any civilians now
that she’s without meds. But allowing that, I can accept Brooke convincing her
to go because they’re now without money, too, so a free meal is a free meal.
But, aside from that, I think the dinner scene might have worked better NOT
knowing the Samaritan had a secret agenda, specifically NOT seeing her put
something in their wine right away. When Mel is suddenly so sleepy, it might’ve
raised a red flag, but still, as an audience we wouldn’t know for sure. Mostly,
I think we’d be nervous as to what Brooke is going to do to the poor hostess
now that she’s alone with her. When the hostess goes to “get more wine,” we
wouldn’t see her get dressed in the plastic raincoat either. I think showing
Brooke make the discovery of the blood on the refrigerator door and then seeing
what the hostess has for leftovers inside the fridge would be a great discovery
for both her AND the audience. Then, after the gruesome discovery she’s
surprised by the hostess clad in stylish American Psycho Wear ™. Brooke then
continue to kill the woman (“this Samaritan picked the wrong person to help
today!”) and when she wakes up Mel, the revelation that Brooke killed their
hostess would just set Mel off and she lays into Brooke. Brooke could finally
show her the evidence in the fridge, or really, maybe not, maybe Mel finally
just backs off but never believes Brooke’s story so the fight would severely
strain their relationship from then on. Which also further feeds into Brooke’s
imaginings of what she thinks Mel really thinks, which is shown so wonderfully
a few times through the film.
4 4. Okay, part of me wondered, “If they really need
to drive all the time to get as far away as possible from their home (and then
additional victims, too), how badly can Brooke be as a driver?” So, I had the
thought, “Gee, too bad we couldn’t see Mel try to teach Brooke how to drive, “
and then watch where that development took us. Either it blows up in Mel’s face
spectacularly, or it seems to work until Brooke starts taking homicidal detours
as Mel sleeps beside her. But, that’s just me with my mind wandering, me
“what-if?”-ing.
5 5. Also, part of me debates whether Brooke would
kill anybody other than menspontaneously. Murdering the dinner hostess makes sense because of the
context, there’s survival involved, arguably. But, the little kids near the
end, I don’t know. But, dramatically, you do need to up the stakes to motivate
Mel to see the lawyer. Brooke’s “trance” conveniently allows the plot to go in
certain directions. But, this could also be me projecting specific motivations
on who she kills (as I stated earler) when perhaps there really are no
motivations at all. Maybe the first victims happened to be men. She’s simply
extremely dangerous. I simply bring this up as a discussion topic.
6 6. Finally, the ending is really interesting. I predicted to
myself as the film wound down that both of them dying would be the way to wrap this up, a
la Romeo and Juliet. And that indeed happened. But, then Mel comes to and gets up. This threw me. Partly
because of her multiple stab wounds (she survived this?), but mostly because Mel and Brooke didn’t
die together. But, as Ithought about
it, especially watching Mel walk off, away from the camera with the end credits starting to roll and descending into the sunrise, it seemed
more appropriate, though not necessarily a “happy ending.” In fact, perhaps
because it ISN’T a happy ending, it seemed appropriate. I mean, it’s a horror
story that happens to be a love story, or at least, a story about two lovers. Because I don’t think that the depiction
of Mel’s anguish over not knowing what to do anymore during the film is an
overt cry by Mel for release from Brooke, it’s simply a cry for some kind of
solution for their situation. Mel’s just at her wit’s end. That the
lawyer may somehow genuinely help them with their situation is a miracle for
Mel. Which of course is immediately torpedoed by Brooke via a hand spade into
the lawyer’s heart. The dream sequences we first see Mel have play as terrible
nightmares of what Mel first feels she’s up against, the constant possibility
of losing Brooke as a lover or losing her to death. But as the film progresses
I can see the dreams transforming from Mel’s fears of losing/failing Brooke and
turning into Mel’s desperate guilty fantasies of getting out of their terrible,
deteriorating situation: if only Brooke would die, if only the responsibility
of protecting Brooke was taken out of Mel’s hands by someone else. And that’s
an awful thing for Mel to realize she’s subconsciously dreaming about, perhaps after
the lawyer’s demise, she’s even consciously hoping for. Okay, maybe this is me over-analyzing a lot, because I didn't really think all this while the end played out. I've been trying to sort out my feelings and articulate them after the fact. It's quite possible I'm really full of shit. But, still I think I could legitimately argue this take on the ending. Brooke and Mel are at their furthest apart emotionally after Brooke kills the lawyer. Mel can't believe she could do that and yells at her and for the first time, Brooke reacts by running away from her. Perhaps realizing what she's done. Mel gives chase but Brooke is long gone. When Mel finally catches up, at a conveniently empty house, Brooke seems to kill her, stabbing her more than once. I wish I could see the film again for this moment because part of me is remembering that Brooke is in her sleepwalking state and that she comes out of it AFTER murdering Mel. But, I could be conveniently misremembering that to fit my half-assed thesis here. Because it seems poetic to me that the now lucid Brooke sees what she's done to Mel, and so she decides to finally end it, and she commits suicide to join Mel (again, so to speak) and also because the thought of living alone is unthinkable. But by committing suicide Brooke does Mel the ultimate (and apparently posthumous) favor of killing
herself as well. And I believe this is the only life, her own life, that Brooke consciously takes, all the other victims' deaths (including Mel, I think) are arguably committed while Brooke’s in her sleepwalking state.Sure, Mel could have merely passed out from the shock of being stabbed several times, but in a real way we thought she had actually died. So, when Mel suddenly rises, it's as if she's been resurrected. In fact, it seems that miraculously, Brooke’s self-sacrifice allows Mel to become resurrected. But sadly, Mel may have been more at
peace in death. As she rises, she sees Brooke lying next to her on the
floor and having committed suicide. As she leaves the house Mel may be arguably free to move on but she also has the
lives of all the innocent victims they killed to contemplate. This awful burden
is something Mel now has to process for the rest of her life.
Kind of deep. And hell, yeah, definitely “fucked
up.”
Blog post edited somewhat 4-19-16, 1:46 am (and I may still do some tinkering with it)
NOTE: A large portion of this post was re-edited from a status on my Facebook page.
Last week, from
Friday Nov. 7 – Thursday, Nov. 13, the second annual Buffalo Dreams Fantastic
Film Festival was held in Buffalo. Actually, to be precise, it was at the Eastern Hills Mall Dipson theaters, a local art film theater with three screens
and Buffalo Dreams took up residence for the week at one of them. During that
week, all I was thinking about was how to make it to the festival every day and
see as many movies as I could while also dancing around my work schedule at
times, plus other personal responsibilities on the calendar (like, my wife’s
birthday, etc.). I did alright, but I still missed a number of films that I had
hoped to catch. Eh, whatchoo gonna do, you know?
But, now, a week
later, the big news item is not trying to see movies but instead, it’s snow.
Lots and LOTS of snow.
The Buffalo area
and its southtowns have literally been buried under lake effect snow since
early Tuesday (Nov. 18). There are the traditional so-called “snow belt” areas
in Buffalo and usually when it snows everyone gets snow, but the belts get a
lot more due to their geographical placement along Lake Erie (it’s all very
meteorological) but we’re not even talking about that dynamic this time,
because these last few days (starting Tuesday) there’s been a genuine curtain
of weather cutting through the area and so, you’ve either been blasted with
snow that would not let up OR you’ve had… nothing. Zilcheroo.
I live north of
the city, and we got some very fluffy snow yesterday (Wednesday), but I also
can still see some leaves in my backyard. Meanwhile, where I work, 27 miles
south and in the Cheektowaga area (a Buffalo suburb), they were HAMMERED.
In fact, my department
supervisor drove in to work earlier than usual Tuesday morning to check out the
circumstances because they had been predicting a huge snowfall since last
weekend and this was the first snow of the season. Since August I’ve been
working in the maintenance/janitorial dept., which is made up of just my boss
and myself. In other words, we’re the company shovelers. My cellphone rang at
5:30 am, just as I was about to leave for work myself, and I heard my boss say,
“Stay home. It’s nuts out here.” Still driving through the streets while on his
phone, he said that where he lived north of Buffalo (Tonawanda, not nearly as
north as me) they had nothing snow-wise, but at the exit off the thruway (the
I-90) near work, there was a wall of snow coming down. He was still negotiating
the streets in his family van as he spoke, saying it was already pretty bad and
he was slowly winding around the occasional car already stuck or trying to get
moving again until suddenly I heard him say he had to stop behind a guy with
his flashers on. That’s when we hung up. Later that day in the early evening I
called him back and discovered he wound up being stranded since I last talked
to him -- over 12 hours earlier! But, fortunately, local residents of a senior
apartment complex came to the rescue and invited him and other trapped
motorists to stay inside their building in their Common room, which is what
they did, sleeping on the floor through the night. Eventually, after 30 hours
of being a metaphorical fly in the snowy ointment, my boss made it back home
Wednesday.
Now, it’s
Thursday, my third snow day, and there’s a bit of a respite in terms of actual
snowfall coming down. But travel bans are still in place as local towns and
villages frantically try to catch up and clear roads of snow and cars before
another predicted wave of snowfall hits tonight.
There have been eight
deaths so far, a couple from heart attacks sustained while shoveling and at
least one fatality due to ambulances being unable to reach the victim.
So, I’ve been
very fortunate considering everything. We’ve had very little snow, just a few
inches yesterday, and lots of wind and cold. My wife’s been sick since last Friday
and has been trying to recuperate, but that’s been slow. At this point, I
haven’t caught whatever she’s had, at least I don’t think so, other than my
head feels a little sore when I touch it and maybe I’m starting to get a sore
throat.
Anyway, I’m
trying to utilize the unexpected down time to do some… writing.
Every time I
attend a film festival (or any film for that matter), I automatically hope to
write some review or feedback of what I saw. This strong impulse usually
results in, well… nada, actually, at
least here in this blog. Sometimes I get something down in a Facebook status, a
rambling long-ass FB status, so that’s something at least.
Anyway, inspired
by Mermaid Heather’s recent(ish) reviews of movies she saw at the (I think),
HorrorHound Weekend in Indianapolis in September, I plan to do the same.
Whenever
the subject of the Buffalo Dreams Fantastic Film Festival comes up, I’m usually
fond of mentioning that this Buffalo film festival is easily my favorite,
although I genuinely enjoy going to any
of the other film festivals in town (if I do
go). When I do fondly say that, I’m usually thinking that the “other” film
festivals are the BNFF (Buffalo Niagara Film Festival, founded by filmmaker
Bill Cowell) and the BIFF (Buffalo International Film Festival, founded by
Edward Summer). There are additional smaller scale themed festivals, like the
Jewish Film Festival, for instance, which schedules a series of films spread over
a few weekends, for instance, and I’m pretty sure that there are more annual
festivals and film series going on in the area that I’m just not aware of. Having
said that, in my head, Buffalo
Dreams, BNFF and BIFF are the three most prominent film festivals in town.
Coincidentally,
I also happen to be friends with the two founders of Buffalo Dreams (I guess
I’m making a disclaimer here), Greg Lamberson and Chris Scioli. If that is why
Buffalo Dreams is my favorite film festival, or it’s my favorite because the
founders of the fest share the same film festival sensibilities that I do, well,
I don’t know. Whatever.
Buffalo
Dreams evolved out of an earlier and now defunct festival, the Buffalo Screams
Horror Film Festival, which was also founded by Greg and Chris and a third
gentleman (and friend), Emil Novak, who also happens to own the oldest comic
book store in Buffalo, Queen City Book Store. After three years of Buffalo
Screams, Emil decided to focus his energies on his business. Greg and Chris
started a new festival the following year, Buffalo Dreams, this time expanding
the programming to include multiple genres, meaning (almost) pretty much
anything: horror, sci-fi, musicals, comedy, fantasy, fan films, music videos,
action films, whatever. Plus, they still focused on bringing a wide variety of
films from around the world and made in WNY. If you look at the five years of
programming between Buffalo Screams and Buffalo Dreams, presenting global and
local entries has always been an important part of their mission statement and
they’ve always been successful achieving that and improving on it each year.
They also get a good amount of filmmakers to attend and talk about their films,
not only from the Western New York area, but out of town, too.
One
of the filmmakers who visited from afar is Isaac Ezban, whom Buffalo was first
introduced to a few years ago at Buffalo Screams when he showed his really
crazy short subject, COSAS FEAS (NASTY STUFF). Isaac came in all the way from
Mexico City along with Mijael Askenazi, his 11 year old star of the film.
Anyway,
I hope to post some reviews or at least some kind of feedback on those films I
did manage to see. But as an appetizer, here’s my introductory overview of this
year’s Buffalo Dreams festival.
Right
off the bat, let me say this: this year’s Buffalo Dreams Fantastic Film
Festival had a particularly great slate of films throughout the week. Generally,
even when I don't like some of the films -- for instance, last year, there were
a few I couldn't get into (WRATH OF THE CROWS) or downright hated (Albert
Pyun's ROAD TO HELL, an unofficial sequel to Walter Hill’s STREETS OF FIRE) --
I still enjoy the festival. Any film festival, for that matter. I figure the
quality of the films is just a small part of the festival programming
crapshoot.
But,
holy cow, THIS year all the films I made it to were either pretty good or
excellent! I only wish I could've seen them all.
Highlights:
-
Local co-writer/director Korey Green's THE ROMANS had its movie premiere and
started off Buffalo Dreams with a bang by not only being the first film
screened at the fest, but also completely selling out the theater. Featuring an
epic cast of characters and storytelling, it’s an urban re-telling of Julius
Caesar. Excellent performances throughout, including Jon Cesar as patriarch
Earl Roman, Jennifer Lynette Holmes as his wife, plusStephen McKinley Henderson and others. My
personal favorite is first time actor Tony Littles as Cicero. Co-written with
former Buffalo Sabres executive/part owner Larry Quinn and sporting some
stylish visuals from cinematographer Matt Quinn. I was impressed with Korey's
soft-spoken confidence a week earlier when he was on the Screenwriting Panel at
the Buffalo Film Expo. At that time he showed the trailer for THE ROMANS which he
used to generate fundraising. Simply but effectively shot, the trailer proved
to be equally effective interesting investors. The film ultimately cost around
$250,000. Some day I also want to check out Korey’s 2006 documentary on the
Buffalo East Side, THE FORGOTTEN CITY, made with fellow Knuckle City Films filmmaker,
Addison Henderson.
-
6 BULLETS TO HELL - This movie was so much fun channeling the 70's spaghetti
western so authentically, that any fan of Sergio Leone and Ennio Morricone would
be hard-pressed to resist it's charm. Added bonus was co-director and star
villain Tanner Beard who came in from Texas. Tanner regaled the appreciative
audience during the Q&A with great stories from behind the scenes. For
instance, Terence Hill's horse from the THEY CALL ME NOBODY movies was in the
equine cast (he was the slower horse)! (NOTE: Maybe it wasn’t Nobody’s actual horse, but the horse was
definitely in those movies. Equine spaghetti street cred!)
-
Although I enjoyed filmmaker Brett Kelly's James Bond spoof, SPYFALL (my
favorite gag was the guy stabbed in the back), I found his Q&A fascinating
as he discussed the film and also what it's like being a director/producer with
a reputation for being able to crank out low-budget films "to order."
“Everybody wants to call me when they have $25,000. Nobody calls me when they
have a million.” Last year, Brett showed his musical zom-com, MY FAIR ZOMBIE.
-
EL INCIDENTE/THE INCIDENT - An anticipated highlight when it was announced as a
festival selection, it did notdisappoint. It was great
seeing writer/director Isaac Ezban back in Buffalo from Mexico City after
having first met him at Buffalo Screams showing his memorable short subject
COSA FEAS twice. Ezban's first feature had a strangely simple premise that
asked a lot of questions and offered lots for the audience to contemplate
during the film and afterwards. Excellent cast and performances, and great
production design throughout. What made the screening even more memorable was
the lengthy Q&A afterwards with Isaac who shared some really great stories,
including casting the older actors, coming up with a great promo item to hand
out at festivals ("I just saw EL INCIDENTE and all I got was this
shit"-- and I JUST got the pun!) and about transporting those items across
the border. On a personal note, I kept bumping into Isaac in the bathroom
upstairs, three days in a row. We'd have these great little conversations every
day, so he was sorely missed when he returned to Mexico and the festival
circuit halfway through the festival. But, SOME day, I hope to make it to
Mexico City and check out the drive-in he's a co-owner of.
-
THE SHOWER - Writer/director Alex Drummond's excellent ensemble cast horror
movie was a definite highlight, with thoughtful writing that focused on
character and direction. And his parents were in the audience!
-Tuesday's
block of medium-length local films, HANDS LIKE SUITCASES (director Chris Cosgrave), SCOPE OF PRACTICE (Brandyn
T. Williams)
and THE OUTLAW: EVIL WOMEN (Aceifer and Fawn Genovese) was quite a spectrum of
material.
HANDS
LIKE SUITCASES was a literal blast from the past, made 17 years ago and showing
a radically transformed Chris Cosgrave, who, in his youth, looked a lot like
Ryan Gosling-- weirdly fascinating. But the filmmaking and its Asian film
influences (John Woo most emphatically and some Jackie Chan in spirit) was
phenomenal and a total shot of adrenalin. Unbelievably, I found Chris's Q&A
and discussion of how he made some of the effects work and the various
generations of dubbing and formats he used to get it from Hi-8 to DVD for the
festival also a thrilling and inspirational segment. I know Chris only in the
most superficial sense, but I came away from this screening really impressed by
him as a filmmaker.
SCOPE
OF PRACTICE was a solidly put together drama and Brandyn is another local
filmmaker whom I've only spoken to and know briefly. But from what I've been
reading over the past couple years from his FB posts and related social media,
he always struck me as being very serious about wanting to be a quality
filmmaker and always striving to achieve a high standard with any project he's
associated. SCOPE was a good example of that, showing excellent production
values all the way around in front and behind the camera. Bobby Gott had a small part in the
film and came up during the Q&A as well, and that seems appropriate,
because it seems all the films Bobby's been involved with also have a distinct
higher level of production value (like B.O.Y.D. and BROKEN WINGS).
Aceifer
Genovese’s EVIL WOMEN episode of THE OUTLAW continues the series' reputation
for insane plotting, characters and visuals. Sometimes the low-budget, bare
bones crew dynamic of the filmmaking would peek through, but for the most part
it offered several memorable moments, including the casting of Penthouse's
Jolene Hexx and also Bill Brown's brain searing appearance, the latter being something
difficult to forget even when I saw him briefly on-screen the next day as a
poet at open mic in FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS DATE FRIENDS. I met Ace a few
years ago when he was involved with the filming of DefTone Pictures’ THE FINAL
NIGHT AND DAY. Cool to know that Ace plans on continuing the Outlaw series “forever..!”
-
Speaking of FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS DATE FRIENDS, local (Albion, NY) writer/director
Rhonda
Parker’s feature debut and student
thesis was a delightful ensemble character study anchored by actress Amelia Favata and featuring solid
performances all around. A romantic comedy with some dramatic elements, with
nods overt and subliminal to filmmakers John Hughes and Kevin Smith, which
Rhonda acknowledged were major creative influences during her Q&A (with a
huge line of the film's cast at her side). The film also does a nice job of
having an upbeat ending without tying up things too neatly. I really look
forward to Rhonda's future projects, which should be interesting on their own,
but also I hope to get to know her more as well because she seems like an
intriguing personality.
-
ELIZABETH BATHORY - I saw this locally made film once before at the Buffalo
Niagara Film Festival earlier this year and that's where I also met one of the
stars of it, Tilke Hill, who, not surprisingly, won a Buffalo Dreams acting award for
her part in it. This film is a good example of the acting talent in the area
and also how the local horror genre film has many more possibilities to explore
than the most obvious display of blood and screams (not that I'm complaining
about blood and screams, I'm just saying that's not the only method of
effectively working the genre). The film has excellent production values and an
inventive use of its locations to get across the time period of its historical
subject, including the Armory on Niagara St. in Buffalo acquitting itself
nicely as Queen Bathory’s castle.
-
There were also several short subjects worth noting, including:
-
THE HEEBIE-JEEBIES, about two kids having problems getting to sleep because
they think there’s a monster under the bed was pretty damn entertaining;
-
GAVE UP THE GHOST - Thrilled I was able to finally see this Gregory Lamberson
helmed, Jeff Strand written film (based on Strand’s short story) because I
missed its premiere screening a few months ago. Shot locally (and in Greg’s
house), the entire cast was delightful, but always glad to see John R Renna on the screen working that
ridiculous magic of his, and although I only knew Drew Bialy's name from FB, it
was great to actually see him in action, because he was pretty good! I think I
also saw Drew in a short subject or two at a student screening of films at Buff
State College earlier in the year as well;
-
I finally saw 13 yr old Hope
Muehlbauer's
short film ZOMBIE KIDS, and man, not only did it not disappoint, it was one of
my personal favorite films of the fest. Yes, this is the movie that choked me
up. At the beginning, part of its charm is knowing the film is made by a young
filmmaker, and there are moments you can point out that indicate that. But as Gregory
Lamberson
has also pointed out, the last act is astounding. Hope's choice and use of metal
music throughout is excellent, but her filmmaking actually matures before your
eyes and the timing of it provides an emotional wallop. And it's a freaking
zombie movie featuring a cast of kids! Unbelievable awesome moment of the
festival for me;
-
CHOMP, from writer/director Lynne Hansen. It looked great and was
very amusing, set in a world where some people think that zombies actually
exist. Featuring a funny cast of experienced and inexperienced talent and a
clever script, it was also interesting to hear the struggles Lynne had during
the production to get the film made;
-
A MALEVOLENT MOON – Writer/director Kenneth Yung’s film presents a young man, Will
Mutka, riding a wave of good luck and ready to propose to his girlfriend but
then has doubts which leads to some unexpected consequences. Fairly straightforward
at the beginning but then takes a surprising turn and goes to an unexpected,
darker conclusion. Yet another recurring festival example of me discovering a
local filmmaker (this time from South Buffalo) whom I never heard of before (like
Sam Qualiana and Aleksandar Ivicic
(among others) from past festivals) and whose work was pretty cool;
-
SIGN was actually a commercial promoting local writer, filmmaker and Buff State
professor Lou Rera's new book, SIGN and it was extremely well done, with great
production values, two involving performances and shot in Silo City and
directed by Joe Blodgett;
-
Jamestown filmmaker Nigel Eastman's STARS was a very short film (5 minutes), somewhat
experimental in tone, that was extremely well made and showed an atypical
filmmaking sensibility that was partly a result of the original restrictions
imposed on the filmmaker (there was a tight deadline for a previous contest),
but during the Q&A, you got a sense that Nigel just looked at things a
little differently already, and definitely not in a bad way. Hopefully we'll see
more of this young dude's films in the future.
Finally,
I also enjoyed talking to local actress Kim Piazza and host of WHAT’S THE
BUZZ IN WESTERN NEW YORK on WBBZ-TV and hearing her issues with understanding
Twitter, which amused me to no end, because I'm usually the odd man out with
new technologies. Kim also hosted the Buffalo Dreams awards ceremony.
The
only real “downside” to the festival was not making it to all the film screenings,
a real impossibility for a variety of reasons. So, I'm still looking forward to
seeing (SOME day) ARMY OF FRANKENSTEINS, CALL GIRL OF CTHULHU, THE DROWNSMAN,
SEPULCHER, CHANNELING, AXE TO GRIND, ATHENA, JULIA, THE SEARCH FOR SIMON, THE
GOD QUESTION, and definitely WITHIN. Also all the short subjects I missed.
ARGGH!
Okay,
hopefully more in-depth reviews of the films coming up! Except now I’m catching
my wife’s cold or flu…
I'm forgetful, so I thought I'd start this list to see what I've been watching and how many films I've watched. But I'm starting this list in April, so I'm going to be playing some catch-up.
My list starts the day before 2014 actually.
Ever since the Y2K scare of New Year's Eve 1999, my wife and I have celebrated New Year's Eve fairly quietly: we buy a bunch of snacks, rent a bunch of DVDs, and try to watch a couple movies until midnight. New Year's Eve 2013 was especially good for us movie-watching-wise, in that we plowed through three whole movies before the ball fell in Times Square AND from the Niagara Mohawk building in Buffalo.
I've also included short subjects in this list (though not on the list of 10 seen in the side margin, natch!) and I've tried to include where I saw it.
Hopefully, I'll have reviews for these films, too, but uh... don't hold your breath. So, for me, this accounting is better than nothing!
And of course, it's a constant work in progress... which means I'm continually adding titles throughout the year (hopefully) and also adding (ie. correcting) film information that I impulsively threw down the first time I added a title to this list.
NEW YEAR'S EVE (DECEMBER 31, 2013, natch!):
1. AT WORLD'S END (2013) - Directed by Edgar Wright; With Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Martin Freeman, Rosamund Pike, Pierce Brosnan. (on DVD)
2. SHARKNADO (2013) (on DVD)
3. WHITE HOUSE DOWN (2013) - With Channing Tatum, Jamie Foxx, James Woods, Maggie Gyllenhal, Joey King. (on DVD)
JANUARY:
Best of Buffalo Dreams Fantastic Film Festival at the Screening Room:
4. THE LAST PIPER (short subject)
5. IMAGO
Best of Buffalo Dreams Fantastic Film Festival at the Screening Room:
6. TASHA AND FRIENDS (short subject),
7. MEMORY SCULPTOR (short subject),
8. MY FAIR ZOMBIE (feature)
9. KILL YOUR DARLINGS -With Daniel Radcliffe. (at the theater)
10. PHILOMENA - Directed by Stephen Frears; With Judi Dench, Steve Coogan, Mare Winningham.
11. AMERICAN HUSTLE - Directed by David O. Russell; With Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper, Jeremy Renner. (at the theater)
FEBRUARY:
It seems like I was watching more stuff than just three movies in February, but I think there's was a period of time where we were watching TV shows, especially the BBC SHERLOCK series with Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman. We also started watching the BBC series WALLANDER with Kenneth Branagh. But, I decided not to include those here.
12. BULLITT - Directed by Peter Yates; With Steve McQueen, Robert Vaughan, Simon Oakland, Jacqueline Bisset, also Robert Duvall. (on DVD)
13. BIG ASS SPIDER! - Directed by Mike Mendez; With Clare Kramer, Ray Wise. (on DVD)
14. SOLOMON KANE (on DVD)
15. FRANKENSTEIN (2011) - Directed by Danny Boyle, written by Nick Dear, adapted from the book by Mary Shelley. With Benedict Cumberbatch as the Creature and Johnny Lee Miller as Victor Frankenstein. Taped broadcast of the play staged at the National Theatre in Britain. Shown at the Amherst Dipson Theater.
MARCH:
16. THE FAMILY - Directed by Luc Besson; With Robert Deniro, Michele Pfeifer, Tommy Lee Jones. (on DVD)
We saw the trailer for this and thought it looked funny. When it came on DVD, I was looking forward to watching it, then a friend of mine said she saw it and didn't think much of it. But then I watched it anyway, and really liked it. And I didn't even realize it was a Luc Besson film! I wound up buying the book it was based on, MALAVITA, by French author Tonino Benaquisto.
17. THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL (2014) - Directed by Wes Anderson; With Ralph Fiennes, F. Murray Abraham, Tilda Swinton, Adrian Brody, Willem Dafoe, Saoirse Ronan, also Jason Schwartzman, Bill Murray, Bob Balaban, Harvey Keitel.
I've definitely become a Wes Anderson fan with his last two films, this one and MOONRISE KINGDOM. After I saw MOONRISE, I bought the DVD and watched it over and over again, obsessively. I've also seen RUSHMORE and THE ROYAL TANENBAUMS, and I really liked those, too, especially TANENBAUMS.
18. WRECKERS (2011) - Directed by D.R. Hood; With Benedict Cumberbatch, Clair Foy, Shaun Evans.